www.madisonrecord.com | www.stclairrecord.com
Jul. 3, 2009 | Metro East's Legal Journal
 
NEWS

Hartford trustees stir litigation pot with new suit

7/18/2008 12:48 PM

Stack
 
Byron
Hartford village trustees, who for years watched outside lawyers represent the entire village in lawsuits over pollution from refinery operations, have suddenly decided that they too can represent the entire village.

The trustees sued 22 oil and pipeline companies in Madison County circuit court July 15, blaming them for a "toxic plume" of gasoline and petroleum waste under the village.

The suit includes Shell Oil subsidiary Equilon and Clark Oil successor Premcor Refining, whose owners thought they had settled all claims in the village.

On July 15, Circuit Judge Daniel Stack approved a settlement in which Equilon and Premcor agreed to spend $16 million in Hartford.

Now Equilon, Premcor and other defendants face new claims, or at least similar claims from a new plaintiff.

The village seeks economic damages for lost use of property, lost profits, diminution of property value, loss of enjoyment, impairment of salability, and "stigma damage."

The village also seeks an injunction requiring remediation of the toxic plume.

The claims overlap with those already before Stack, and to compound the confusion Stack won't handle the village's suit.

Chief Judge Ann Callis assigned it to Circuit Judge Nicholas Byron.

Stack has struggled for years to resolve a multitude of clashes over the pollution.

He certified a class action suit for attorneys from St. Louis and Kansas City in 2005, but granted reconsideration.

While he reconsidered, Mark Goldenberg of Edwardsville converted a group of individual clients into a class and reached an apparent settlement.

Over objections from the Missouri lawyers, Stack granted preliminary approval of Goldenberg's settlement in 2006.

Before Goldenberg could win final approval, the settlement collapsed.

Stack ordered mediation, and prospects looked bright last year when Goldenberg and the Missouri team stopped feuding and agreed to cooperate.

As mediation continued, however, cooperation among the defendants broke down.

Equilon and Premcor agreed to settle, but British Petroleum and Sinclair Oil protested that Equilon and Premcor intended to recover their costs from BP and Sinclair.

The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency stirred the mixture by suggesting that BP should clean up the pollution and recover the cost from everyone else.

Now Hartford trustees have added a new ingredient to the mixture.

Village attorney Rene Bassett Butler excused the village's late arrival in court by accusing defendants of lying and cheating.

"Defendants have engaged in a campaign of deception and fraud designed to hide the true nature, extent and effect of the toxic plume, so that the contamination continues to spread," Butler wrote.

Due to the deception, she wrote, "plaintiffs and the Hartford community have been prevented from taking action to fully protect their rights and property interests from the devastating effects of the contamination."

Defendants caused lower assessments of real estate in the village and decreased tax revenue, she wrote.

"Further, the actions of defendants resulted in increased costs of municipal services because of detrimental results from said contamination from the plume," she wrote.

Contamination has damaged sewers, streets and municipal buildings, she wrote, and it has increased water treatment expenses.

"Plaintiff has suffered a loss of economic revenue by the stigma of the toxic plume, in that developers are not as likely to locate in the village because of the perceived contamination," she wrote.

Prolonged rains cause liquids to leach and vapors to seep into basements, she wrote, and residents complain of respiratory difficulty and headaches.

Defendants have failed to abate the contamination, she wrote.

"Instead, the pollution continues and the residents of Hartford continue to suffer exposure to harmful vapors containing benzene, toluene, xylene, n-hexane and other volatile, toxic chemicals," she wrote.

"None of these defendants has done anything substantial to stop, clean up, or in any way remediate the toxic plume in order to stop its harmful effects," she wrote.

"Plaintiffs have suffered and will continue to suffer discomfort, anxiety, fear, worries, stress, and mental and emotional distress," she wrote.



EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

blog comments powered by Disqus
EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT

SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Right Decision, Wrong Author - 6/28/2009
Your real estate attorney's role in a home purchase - 6/28/2009

ARGUMENTS Archive

Have you ever received an unsolicited fax and considered a class action?
Yes
 
(31%)
No
 
(69%)
Total Votes:67

Thank you for voting in this poll.

This poll is closed.

View Results

Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
Legal Notices for Publication
Place a Classified ad
Where can you find the print edition of The Record ?
Contact The Record
By way of introduction

Tech experts to speak at People in Business meeting June 23
Wood River insurance rep honored by Mutual of Omaha
New engineer joins Heneghan and Associates
Sandberg Phoenix & von Gontard Charitable Foundation announces charities
ISBA to hold continuing education program on work comp in Fairview Heights
Read actual Madison County class action complaints!
Sign Up
Login
You can advertise in The Record!

Country Hearth Inn & Suites