www.madisonrecord.com | www.stclairrecord.com
Jul. 4, 2009 | Metro East's Legal Journal
 
NEWS

Lakin files class action against mortgage lender over pre-recorded messages

10/22/2007 3:56 PM

American Freedom Mortgage in O'Fallon
A local mortgage loan company is the target of a new class action lawsuit claiming it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for using automated telephone dialing equipment to deliver pre-recorded promotional messages to residences.

The Lakin Law Firm of Wood River filed the complaint against Amerifirst, Inc. (dba American Freedom Mortgage, American Freedom Home Lending, American National Brokerage) on Oct. 18 in St. Clair County Circuit Court. Amerifirst has an office at 1309 West Highway 50 in O'Fallon.

Plaintiff Marilyn Margulis seeks to represent a class of "at least 39 other" call recipients.

"On or about May 10, 2007, using an automatic telephone dialing system, Defendant called Plaintiff's telephone number which was assigned to a residential telephone service and delivered a message containing a pre-recorded voice message," the complaint states.

Lakin's co-counsel includes Phillip A. Bock of Diab & Bock in Chicago and Brian J. Wanca of Anderson & Wanca in Rolling Meadows, Ill.

Plaintiff's counsel is experienced in handling claims brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the suit says.

"Defendant knew or should have known that it delivered a prerecorded message to Plaintiff advertising the commercial availability of any property, goods, or services and did not have the prior express consent of Plaintiff to make such telephone contact and that no established business relationship existed with Plaintiff," the complaint states.

The suit asserts that state court jurisdiction is appropriate because individual claims are worth less than $75,000.

According to the complaint, Amerifirst failed to correctly determine the legal restrictions on the use of prerecorded message to residential phone subscribers.

The two-count suit also claims the class has been damaged by invasion of privacy.

"Defendant's pre-recorded telephone call invaded Plaintiff's right of privacy to be left alone and maintain her seclusion in her residence," the complaint states.




EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

blog comments powered by Disqus
EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT

SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Right Decision, Wrong Author - 6/28/2009
Your real estate attorney's role in a home purchase - 6/28/2009

ARGUMENTS Archive

Have you ever received an unsolicited fax and considered a class action?
Yes
 
(31%)
No
 
(69%)
Total Votes:67

Thank you for voting in this poll.

This poll is closed.

View Results

Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
Legal Notices for Publication
Place a Classified ad
Where can you find the print edition of The Record ?
Contact The Record
By way of introduction

Tech experts to speak at People in Business meeting June 23
Wood River insurance rep honored by Mutual of Omaha
New engineer joins Heneghan and Associates
Sandberg Phoenix & von Gontard Charitable Foundation announces charities
ISBA to hold continuing education program on work comp in Fairview Heights
Read actual Madison County class action complaints!
Sign Up
Login
You can advertise in The Record!

Country Hearth Inn & Suites