www.madisonrecord.com | www.stclairrecord.com
Jul. 3, 2009 | Metro East's Legal Journal
 
ARGUMENTS

Class action, costumed

9/16/2007 2:20 PM

What's the best way to disguise from a city's taxpayers that they are volunteer put-up plaintiffs in a trial lawyer-concocted class action lawsuit?

Don't call it a class action lawsuit.

That's what apparently happened in Fairview Heights, a Metro-East suburb currently the reluctant client of ex-Lakin Law Firm ace Richard Burke.

He's taking on a good portion of America's e-travel industry on Fairview Heights' behalf, "authorized" by a 2005 city council resolution directing city lawyers to initiate "any necessary legal action on behalf of itself and other similarly-situated Illinois taxing authorities to recover any and all unpaid taxes."

That's lawyer-speak for "class action." But Burke and city attorneys, mindful of how the public sees class action lawsuits, oft-carefully crafted to enrich lawyers with millions while offering plaintiffs but a victory pat on the back, took care not to include those touchy two words.

And lest the aldermen notice to what they had agreed, their new lawyers also didn't waste much time. A day after the resolution passed, we now know, Burke and his cohorts sprinted to the St. Clair County courthouse to file suit for Fairview Heights, making it the leader of a statewide class action suit alleging companies like Orbitz, Hotwire, Expedia and Priceline cheated tens of Illinois cities out of hotel taxes.

The resolution itself was revealed to The Record by City Attorney Al Paulson this past week, after city aldermen complained they were never told Fairview Heights was volunteering as the plaintiff in Mr. Burke's class action.

They were told and they agreed to the resolution, argued Paulson.

Or, not exactly.

If this whole episode strikes you as unseemly or distasteful, that's because it should.

From the sequence of events, it sure looks like these lawyers conceived this class action lawsuit, one that pitted hotel-taxing municipalities against travel e-tailers we know and love, themselves, and on spec. They then went hunting for a willing, or lawyer-less, city council to carry it for them.

Fairview Heights proved a worthy mark. It mustn't remain one.

An attorney-client relationship is at will; it isn't supposed to resemble a hostage situation. If Burke, Paulson and their cohorts used sleight of hand to make Fairview Heights a class action plaintiff, city aldermen should be firm and direct in showing them the door.


EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

blog comments powered by Disqus
EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT

SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Right Decision, Wrong Author - 6/28/2009
Your real estate attorney's role in a home purchase - 6/28/2009

ARGUMENTS Archive

Have you ever received an unsolicited fax and considered a class action?
Yes
 
(31%)
No
 
(69%)
Total Votes:67

Thank you for voting in this poll.

This poll is closed.

View Results

Attention bloggers:
Add Record Headlines to your site!


fast + free- click here
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
Legal Notices for Publication
Place a Classified ad
Where can you find the print edition of The Record ?
Contact The Record
By way of introduction

Tech experts to speak at People in Business meeting June 23
Wood River insurance rep honored by Mutual of Omaha
New engineer joins Heneghan and Associates
Sandberg Phoenix & von Gontard Charitable Foundation announces charities
ISBA to hold continuing education program on work comp in Fairview Heights
Read actual Madison County class action complaints!
Sign Up
Login
You can advertise in The Record!

Country Hearth Inn & Suites