www.madisonrecord.com | www.stclairrecord.com
Aug. 20, 2008 | Metro East's Legal Journal
 
ARGUMENTS

Dell Hell

5/13/2007 1:00 PM
Our View

The blue hyperlink. It represents, indisputably, the essence of the Internet.

Whatever. We've been arguing about it here in Edwardsville for five years now; about whether for web surfers, the concept just assumes too much.

And one wonders why it takes so long to obtain justice-- or closure-- at the Madison County Courthouse.

Serial court clogger Steve Tillery, the Belleville plaintiff's attorney who cannot seem to stop making news, deemed the hyperlink unworthy back in 2002. He filed a class action lawsuit against Dell, the Texas-based company that makes more computers than almost any other in the world.

His argument: following a hyperlink is too much to ask. Online computer buyers had to click on one to read the "terms and conditions" of their online purchases with Dell. They had to follow a link to learn that, if they were to have a future problem, they'd have to try arbitration first before hauling off and hiring a guy like Tillery to sue the company.

Arbitration is a cheaper alternative to litigation. It doesn't involve lawyers or legal fees. Mr. Tillery doesn't dig arbitration. Go figure.

Then-Third Circuit Judge Phillip Kardis-- his spirit lives on-- agreed with Tillery. But sanity prevailed. In 2005, the Fifth District Appellate Court reversed him with authority.

The justices wondered-- why did the court allow Tillery to enter a Washington Post newspaper article as evidence? And isn't the fact that someone is buying online enough to assume they know how to use a hyperlink? The court ordered in March 2006: Tillery's Dell case should be dismissed.

The case is supposed to be but another (sad) Madison County memory. So why are we still talking about it?

The Record
learned last week that Tillery v. The Internet, like the $10.1 billion Philip Morris verdict, apparently still lives.

Far from being tossed in the Third Circuit dustbin like those higher-ups in Mt. Vernon demanded, it is still hanging around in limbo, playing the useful vehicle for Tillery on a separate crusade, helping him challenge Chief Judge Ann Callis' rule that limits judge shopping by lawyers.

It mustn't. A year late, the Dell case should be dismissed immediately once and for all, ending this charade.

It's time our judges stopped bending over backwards to accommodate Mr. Tillery and started showing some respect for the integrity of Illinois' appellate court system.


EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US






COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

No comments have been posted in the last 15 days!


SEND US YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE



* - Required fields

Subject: *
Message: *
Contact Name: *
Contact URL:
Contact Email: *
This Is CAPTCHA Image
Write the characters in the image above: 


EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT

SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Respect Precedent - 8/17/2008
Big Fish - 8/16/2008

ARGUMENTS Archive

Should Madison and St. Clair County judges follow a federal judge in dismissing PPO class actions?
Yes
 
 
(25.22%)
No
 
 
(74.78%)
 

Total Votes: 115

View Results

Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
Legal Notices for Publication
Place a Classified ad
Where can you find the print edition of The Record ?
Contact The Record
By way of introduction

National Bank participates in Kids Day America
Moser & Marsalek welcomes Juliano P.C. to practice
People in Business meeting set May 27
Local student honored for Outstanding Volunteer Service at award presentation
Relay for Life team from Hepler Broom hosts trivia night
Read actual Madison County class action complaints!
Sign Up
Login
You can advertise in The Record!



Happiness Spreads